![]() Pale Moon however, clearly respects your privacy and Moonchild seems to respect your privacy as well which is a real bonus for me.Īnyways, those are just my reasons. Of course, we all know how bad Chrome is with privacy, but Firefox too (Cliqz) can be a bit sp00ky sometimes and I don't particularly like that fact.Firefox and Chrome are both very resource and ram intensive and subsequently don't do well in that category, whilst Pale Moon does really well on low end and old hardware. ![]() I need a browser that'll work and run fast on very low end hardware. For some who regularly uses PCs with equal to or sub 2gigs of ram, Firefox Quantum and Chrome don't cut.Also, I seriously hate Firefox Quantum's UI and that's one of the big things which drove me away from FF Quantum. Aside from that, the menu in Pale Moon is a lot nicer to use than in Firefox and Chrome. Since I love aero's glassy look, naturally this was great news for me as Windows 7 user. Pale Moon can actually adapt to the UI of it's host OS, looking metro-like in Windows 8.x, aero-like in Windows 7, and XP/Classic-like in Windows XP. But you can't change it and still call it Pale Moon, not without official permission. The most important reason people chose Pale. Pale Moon is open and the code is free to anybody who wants to use it and call it something else. ![]() Pale Moon has a clear victory over both Chrome and Firefox in this category. In the questionWhat are the best desktop web browsers Pale Moon is ranked 3rd while Google Chrome is ranked 23rd. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |